
Abajo Mountains
The following tables show what percentage of lands are within specified distances
from motorized roads and trails.
We give figures for four distances:
- Less than 0.5 miles from a road - Areas dominated by motor vehicle use.
- Less than 1 mile from a road - Noise from dirt bikes, ATVs, etc. clearly noticeable.
- Greater than 2 miles from a road - Areas little impacted by ORV use.
- Greater than 3 miles from a road - Primitive areas, far from roads.
|
La Sals and Abajos Wilderness proposal: click on map
|
|
|
Our conclusion: The current transportation plans are heavily biased in favor of
motorized recreation, with few opportunities to get out of earshot of roads and ORV trails.
Even our proposal would leave a majority of National Forest lands close to a road
(within 1 mile).
Our plan would restore recreational balance; the existing situation is unbalanced and getting worse.
We analyze two regions, the La Sal Mountains (Moab Ranger District) and the Abajo Mountains
(Monticello Ranger District).
We also give figures for larger regions including all land ownership, to show that quiet recreation
opportunities which are hard to find on National Forests are not abundant on nearby BLM lands,
National Parks, etc.
In future we will do a similar analysis for all Utah National Forests.
In southern Utah, we expect the numbers for other regions to lie somewhere between
the numbers for the La Sals and the Abajos.
Based on a preliminary look at the data, we predict that for all southern Utah National Forest lands,
our plan will leave 2/3's of the Forest within 1 mile of a road and less than 10% greater
than 2 miles from a road.
| Abajo Mountains (Monticello Ranger District) |
| Distance from roads | Current Travel Plan |
UFN Wilderness Proposal |
| less than 0.5 miles | 54.6% | 31.2% |
| less than 1 mile | 80.5% | 54.2% |
| greater than 2 miles | 1.5% | 19.3% |
| greater than 3 miles | 0.1% | 6.3% |
|
|
|
|